<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Chaotic Glass by Mike Aurelius</title>
	<atom:link href="http://mikeaurelius.wordpress.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://mikeaurelius.wordpress.com</link>
	<description>Safety for the glassworker, and random thoughts and opinions on the state of the glassworking world</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 12:34:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on Bulk tanks and the Hot Head Torch by mikeaurelius</title>
		<link>http://mikeaurelius.wordpress.com/2007/12/30/bulk-tanks-and-the-hot-head-torch/#comment-1429</link>
		<dc:creator>mikeaurelius</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 12:34:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mikeaurelius.wordpress.com/2007/12/30/bulk-tanks-and-the-hot-head-torch/#comment-1429</guid>
		<description>Oxygen is not explosive. Not even a tiny bit. Oxygen is, as you pointed out, an accelerant. In the presence of fuel (solid, liquid, gas), it makes the fuel burn hotter.

There is no discrepancy here at all. Oxygen and propane, oxygen and hydrogen, oxygen and acetylene are all commonly used together, quite safely, and yes, many times in apartment buildings.

As I&#039;ve pointed out elsewhere, the safety issue is one of major concern to me. Oxygen, however, is not the issue here, propane is. Let&#039;s stay focused on that!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oxygen is not explosive. Not even a tiny bit. Oxygen is, as you pointed out, an accelerant. In the presence of fuel (solid, liquid, gas), it makes the fuel burn hotter.</p>
<p>There is no discrepancy here at all. Oxygen and propane, oxygen and hydrogen, oxygen and acetylene are all commonly used together, quite safely, and yes, many times in apartment buildings.</p>
<p>As I&#8217;ve pointed out elsewhere, the safety issue is one of major concern to me. Oxygen, however, is not the issue here, propane is. Let&#8217;s stay focused on that!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Bulk tanks and the Hot Head Torch by werper</title>
		<link>http://mikeaurelius.wordpress.com/2007/12/30/bulk-tanks-and-the-hot-head-torch/#comment-1427</link>
		<dc:creator>werper</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2009 21:52:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mikeaurelius.wordpress.com/2007/12/30/bulk-tanks-and-the-hot-head-torch/#comment-1427</guid>
		<description>I really don&#039;t mean to be argumentative, just point out a discrepancy and pose a question.  

You mention nothing of the danger of using Oxygen AND propane (or any other fuel) with a two-gas torch.  You simply say &quot;hotter, more focused, and use far less fuel. And they are miles away more quieter.&quot; You never say it&#039;s  safer.  I suspect that&#039;s because it&#039;s not.  Oxygen is HYPER explosive AND an accelerant.  It would seem common sense to me using two explosive gasses is twice as dangerous as just one.  How do/can anyone, especially apartment dwellers, use ANY type of torch safely and legally other than outside, away from a building?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I really don&#8217;t mean to be argumentative, just point out a discrepancy and pose a question.  </p>
<p>You mention nothing of the danger of using Oxygen AND propane (or any other fuel) with a two-gas torch.  You simply say &#8220;hotter, more focused, and use far less fuel. And they are miles away more quieter.&#8221; You never say it&#8217;s  safer.  I suspect that&#8217;s because it&#8217;s not.  Oxygen is HYPER explosive AND an accelerant.  It would seem common sense to me using two explosive gasses is twice as dangerous as just one.  How do/can anyone, especially apartment dwellers, use ANY type of torch safely and legally other than outside, away from a building?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on On-Site Consulting now available by Robyn</title>
		<link>http://mikeaurelius.wordpress.com/on-site-consulting-now-available/#comment-1331</link>
		<dc:creator>Robyn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Sep 2009 14:25:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mikeaurelius.wordpress.com/?page_id=180#comment-1331</guid>
		<description>Looking for studio set up guidance.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Looking for studio set up guidance.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Ventilation Basics, Part 3 by Will Harrison</title>
		<link>http://mikeaurelius.wordpress.com/2007/12/25/ventilation-basics-part-3/#comment-1328</link>
		<dc:creator>Will Harrison</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Sep 2009 22:16:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mikeaurelius.wordpress.com/2007/12/25/ventilation-basics-part-3/#comment-1328</guid>
		<description>http://www.facebook.com/home.php#/photo.php?pid=30559019&amp;id=1514834514 sorry here is the photo.  

I notice that without the torch on incense smoke does an okay job at moving its way to the fan but with the torch on the updraft makes everything in front of the torch gone.  I worry though about spots around the hood that dont get sucked out and I wonder what I can do about this.  I will get info from grainger but I got a furnace blower second hand that i believe is 1500 CFM and I have it wired on the lowest setting.  I want to rest knowing that this is okay for me to work under.  I have a air velocity meter at work and I wonder what it should say when I hold it in front of me.  It measures in feet/minute.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.facebook.com/home.php#/photo.php?pid=30559019&amp;id=1514834514" rel="nofollow">http://www.facebook.com/home.php#/photo.php?pid=30559019&amp;id=1514834514</a> sorry here is the photo.  </p>
<p>I notice that without the torch on incense smoke does an okay job at moving its way to the fan but with the torch on the updraft makes everything in front of the torch gone.  I worry though about spots around the hood that dont get sucked out and I wonder what I can do about this.  I will get info from grainger but I got a furnace blower second hand that i believe is 1500 CFM and I have it wired on the lowest setting.  I want to rest knowing that this is okay for me to work under.  I have a air velocity meter at work and I wonder what it should say when I hold it in front of me.  It measures in feet/minute.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Ventilation Basics, Part 3 by Will Harrison</title>
		<link>http://mikeaurelius.wordpress.com/2007/12/25/ventilation-basics-part-3/#comment-1327</link>
		<dc:creator>Will Harrison</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Sep 2009 22:02:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mikeaurelius.wordpress.com/2007/12/25/ventilation-basics-part-3/#comment-1327</guid>
		<description>I would like to get some help with setting up my exhaust hood.  Here is a pic of my studio in my basement.  I want to put the blower outside so it is not noisy and after reading your article I need to change out the flexible ducting.  I first need to know so more info.  I am confused about how high it should be from torch head, and also where in relation to the torch it is.  Basically if I hung a string from the front of the hood where would the string hang in relationship to me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would like to get some help with setting up my exhaust hood.  Here is a pic of my studio in my basement.  I want to put the blower outside so it is not noisy and after reading your article I need to change out the flexible ducting.  I first need to know so more info.  I am confused about how high it should be from torch head, and also where in relation to the torch it is.  Basically if I hung a string from the front of the hood where would the string hang in relationship to me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Glassworking, an expensive hobby by sandrar</title>
		<link>http://mikeaurelius.wordpress.com/glassworking-an-expensive-hobby/#comment-1297</link>
		<dc:creator>sandrar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Sep 2009 14:33:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mikeaurelius.wordpress.com/glassworking-an-expensive-hobby/#comment-1297</guid>
		<description>Hi! I was surfing and found your blog post... nice! I love your blog.  :) Cheers! Sandra. R.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi! I was surfing and found your blog post&#8230; nice! I love your blog.  <img src='http://s.wordpress.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />  Cheers! Sandra. R.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Makeup Air, or Your Fresh Air Supply by mikeaurelius</title>
		<link>http://mikeaurelius.wordpress.com/2007/12/27/makeup-air-or-your-fresh-air-supply/#comment-1246</link>
		<dc:creator>mikeaurelius</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Aug 2009 13:27:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mikeaurelius.wordpress.com/2007/12/27/makeup-air-or-your-fresh-air-supply/#comment-1246</guid>
		<description>The picture above (shown as option 1) is what the local HVAC folks did at my studio.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The picture above (shown as option 1) is what the local HVAC folks did at my studio.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Makeup Air, or Your Fresh Air Supply by mikeaurelius</title>
		<link>http://mikeaurelius.wordpress.com/2007/12/27/makeup-air-or-your-fresh-air-supply/#comment-1245</link>
		<dc:creator>mikeaurelius</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Aug 2009 13:19:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mikeaurelius.wordpress.com/2007/12/27/makeup-air-or-your-fresh-air-supply/#comment-1245</guid>
		<description>Chuck - I used this system in Sauk Rapids and the inspector had no problem with it. The only thing he &quot;requested&quot; was that additional fresh air ducting be routed to the existing furnace so that the furnace wouldn&#039;t &quot;starve&quot; for air.

There&#039;s no reason at all to have a furnace in-line with the fresh air, as you say, it will do nothing but pump all that heat outside. Foolish to say the least.

If he&#039;s concerned about starving the furnace, have him run a smaller duct direct to the furnace. That&#039;s code anyway on all houses built since sometime in the 1980&#039;s.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chuck &#8211; I used this system in Sauk Rapids and the inspector had no problem with it. The only thing he &#8220;requested&#8221; was that additional fresh air ducting be routed to the existing furnace so that the furnace wouldn&#8217;t &#8220;starve&#8221; for air.</p>
<p>There&#8217;s no reason at all to have a furnace in-line with the fresh air, as you say, it will do nothing but pump all that heat outside. Foolish to say the least.</p>
<p>If he&#8217;s concerned about starving the furnace, have him run a smaller duct direct to the furnace. That&#8217;s code anyway on all houses built since sometime in the 1980&#8217;s.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Makeup Air, or Your Fresh Air Supply by chuck burton</title>
		<link>http://mikeaurelius.wordpress.com/2007/12/27/makeup-air-or-your-fresh-air-supply/#comment-1243</link>
		<dc:creator>chuck burton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Aug 2009 19:12:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mikeaurelius.wordpress.com/2007/12/27/makeup-air-or-your-fresh-air-supply/#comment-1243</guid>
		<description>Mike,
My HVAC guy isn&#039;t sure that make up air fed to the bench will pass code--but he has never seen anything like this before. Can you give me any localities in Minnesota that have inspected this system? He currently wants to make the replacement air duct provide for the torch hood and the heating but that won&#039;t do what I want [exhaust torch fumes] without requiring a monster furnace blowing out a massive amount of BTUs to keep the place warm. Again any help is much appreciated.
chuck</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mike,<br />
My HVAC guy isn&#8217;t sure that make up air fed to the bench will pass code&#8211;but he has never seen anything like this before. Can you give me any localities in Minnesota that have inspected this system? He currently wants to make the replacement air duct provide for the torch hood and the heating but that won&#8217;t do what I want [exhaust torch fumes] without requiring a monster furnace blowing out a massive amount of BTUs to keep the place warm. Again any help is much appreciated.<br />
chuck</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Makeup Air, or Your Fresh Air Supply by chuck burton</title>
		<link>http://mikeaurelius.wordpress.com/2007/12/27/makeup-air-or-your-fresh-air-supply/#comment-1225</link>
		<dc:creator>chuck burton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Jul 2009 16:07:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mikeaurelius.wordpress.com/2007/12/27/makeup-air-or-your-fresh-air-supply/#comment-1225</guid>
		<description>Thanks! It all sounded pretty obvious, but after reading a variety of contradicting opinions from multiple sources, I wanted to be sure I really understood what you were talking about. I appreciate you taking the time. Thanks again.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks! It all sounded pretty obvious, but after reading a variety of contradicting opinions from multiple sources, I wanted to be sure I really understood what you were talking about. I appreciate you taking the time. Thanks again.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
